Single-sig fails in one step

Every single-signature failure mode is a one-step failure: a house fire, a misplaced steel plate, a burglary, a death in the family. There is no second chance built into the structure, so all protection has to come from perfect behaviour over decades.

That is a lot to ask of any household, particularly one where only a single person understands the setup.

What multisig actually changes

Multisig converts catastrophic single events into survivable ones. Losing a key becomes an administrative task - rotate the structure - rather than a permanent loss. Finding a backup becomes insufficient for theft.

It also creates a legitimate handover mechanism: an executor can be given a documented path to assemble a quorum under defined conditions, without any individual holding spending power in the meantime.

The cost side, honestly

Multisig requires more devices, a recorded wallet descriptor, and periodic verification that recovery still works. Poorly documented multisig can be worse than good single-sig, because complexity without documentation is just a slower way to lose access.

This is why the deliverable is not a wallet - it is the wallet plus written custody architecture, recovery steps and executor instructions.